Notation guide for kin types, relations and diagrams
Last update: Oct. 14, 2026
Kinship is easy to talk about and hard to talk about precisely. "My cousin" can mean any of eight first-cousin positions and many more distant ones; "my uncle" can be a blood relative or someone who married in. The notation below removes that ambiguity. It is the shorthand used across this site, and where the literature uses other conventions, the variants are listed so you can read older and newer work without tripping.
Kin-type letters
Every genealogical position is written as a string of single capital letters, one per link.
| Letter | Stands for | Sex-neutral counterpart |
|---|---|---|
| F | father | P, parent |
| M | mother | P, parent |
| B | brother | G, sibling |
| Z | sister | G, sibling |
| S | son | C, child |
| D | daughter | C, child |
| H | husband | E, spouse |
| W | wife | E, spouse |
Sister is Z because S is already taken by son. The sex-neutral letters P, C, G and E follow the recommendations in Barnard and Good's handbook of kinship research methods (1984); they are handy when a rule applies to both sexes, as in "PG", any parent's sibling. Some reference works use two-letter codes instead, such as SI for sibling and SP for spouse.
Reading a string
A string is read from Ego outward, left to right, as a chain of possessives. Ego is implicit and never written unless a formula needs it.
| String | Read as | Usual American English term |
|---|---|---|
| FB | father's brother | uncle |
| MBD | mother's brother's daughter | cousin |
| FZS | father's sister's son | cousin |
| WB | wife's brother | brother-in-law |
| HZ | husband's sister | sister-in-law |
| ZDH | sister's daughter's husband | niece's husband |
| FFBSS | father's father's brother's son's son | second cousin |
There are no spaces and no apostrophes inside a string. When a string is long, read it in pairs from the left: FF, then B, then S, then S.
Elder and younger: e and y
Many terminologies separate older from younger siblings, so the notation needs a way to mark relative age. A lowercase e (elder) or y (younger) goes immediately before the letter it qualifies: eB is an elder brother, yZ a younger sister.
On this site the marker compares a person with the one just before them in the string. FeB is a brother older than Ego's father, not necessarily older than Ego. This matters when you reverse a relationship, as the worked example at the end shows.
Sex of the speaker: ms and ws
The same position can take different terms depending on whether a man or a woman is speaking. We add (ms) for "man speaking" or (ws) for "woman speaking" after the string: ZS (ms) is a man's sister's son. You will also meet (m.s.) and (f.s.), for male speaking and female speaking; they mean the same thing.
Where a terminology turns on whether two siblings are of the same or opposite sex, we write ss or os before the sibling letter: an osG is an opposite-sex sibling, so for a man, his sister.
Generation and collateral distance
To place any consanguineal relative, count two numbers. Let u be the number of steps up from Ego to the nearest ancestor Ego shares with the relative (for a direct ancestor, the relative is that ancestor), and d the number of steps down from that ancestor to the relative. Then:
- generation = u - d, written G+1, G0, G-1 and so on (positive means senior to Ego; some texts write just +1, 0, -1)
- collateral distance = the smaller of u and d (0 means lineal, a direct ancestor or descendant)
- for cousins, degree = the smaller of u and d, minus 1; removal = the difference between u and d
| Kin type | u | d | Generation | Collateral distance | Genealogist's name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 1 | 0 | G+1 | 0 (lineal) | parent |
| FF | 2 | 0 | G+2 | 0 (lineal) | grandparent |
| S | 0 | 1 | G-1 | 0 (lineal) | child |
| B | 1 | 1 | G0 | 1 | sibling |
| FB | 2 | 1 | G+1 | 1 | uncle |
| BS | 1 | 2 | G-1 | 1 | nephew |
| FBS | 2 | 2 | G0 | 2 | first cousin |
| FBSS | 2 | 3 | G-1 | 2 | first cousin once removed |
| FFBS | 3 | 2 | G+1 | 2 | first cousin once removed |
| FFBSS | 3 | 3 | G0 | 3 | second cousin |
The same two numbers drive the cousin calculator. They also give the coefficient of relationship for relatives linked through a pair of full siblings: r = 2 × (1/2)^(u + d), so a first cousin is 2 × (1/2)^4 = 1/8. For affines, count through the linking spouse: WB stands in Ego's generation because W does.
Diagram symbols
| Symbol | Meaning | Variants you may meet |
|---|---|---|
| △ | male | |
| ○ | female | |
| □ or ◇ | sex unknown or not relevant | clinical genetic pedigrees use a square for male and a diamond for unknown sex |
| = between two symbols | marriage or union | a line joining the two from below |
| ≠ | divorce or separation | a marriage line crossed by one or two short strokes |
| vertical line | descent, from a couple down to their children | |
| horizontal bar above several symbols | siblings, each hanging from the bar | |
| diagonal slash through a symbol | deceased | the symbol filled in or shaded |
| Ego | the person the diagram is drawn from | labeled "Ego", marked with an arrow, or shaded |
Because shading can mean either "deceased" or "Ego" depending on the author, every diagram on this site carries a key. Generations are drawn as horizontal rows with the oldest at the top. For a step-by-step drawing exercise, see how to draw a kinship diagram.
Relations and how they compose
Each letter can be read as a relation: M(x) is the mother of x, B(x) the set of brothers of x. Linking two relations is composition, written with ∘ and read right to left, the way mathematicians compose functions. So (F∘M)(x) = F(M(x)), "the father of the mother of x". In a kin-type string that same person is MF. The two notations run in opposite directions, which is the commonest source of slips.
| String | Composition | In words |
|---|---|---|
| MF | F∘M | mother's father |
| FM | M∘F | father's mother |
| MBD | D∘B∘M | mother's brother's daughter |
| WB | B∘W | wife's brother |
F∘M and M∘F are different people, so composition of kin relations is not commutative in general. Whether it becomes commutative for the classes of a particular marriage system is exactly the question behind the note on Abelian kinship systems.
The same notation describes marriage-class systems. In Philippe Courrège's formulation (1965), a permutation ω says that men of class x marry women of class ω(x), and a permutation μ says that women of class x have children in class μ(x). A man's children then belong to class μ(ω(x)), written π = μ∘ω: first find his wife's class, then her children's. The explainer on André Weil's algebra works through a four-class example.
Two more conventions are worth fixing early.
- Converses. P and C are converses of each other; G and E are their own converses. To reverse a whole string, write it backward, replace each letter by its converse, and take each person's sex from the person you arrive at. MB reversed: from the uncle, step to his sister (Ego's mother), Z; then to her child, Ego, S or D. So Ego is MB's ZS or ZD, always man speaking, because MB is a man.
- Assumptions. Identities such as FW = M or MH = F hold only in a model without remarriage; once step relations are allowed, FW may be a stepmother. State the assumption before you simplify a string.
Terms and types
A kin type is a genealogical position (MB). A kin term is a word in a particular language (uncle). On this site types are always in capitals and terms in italics; a term from another language is italicized and glossed in quotation marks. The set of types a term covers is its range: English uncle covers FB, MB, FZH and MZH, while cousin covers all eight first-cousin types and many more distant ones.
To show that two types share a term in some terminology, we write a tilde: in an Iroquois-type terminology FB ~ F and FBS ~ B, while in English FB ~ MB. Reduction-rule analyses in the tradition of Lounsbury (1964) write rules with arrows that rewrite a longer type to a shorter one with the same term, and separate a term's focal referent from its extended ones. The six kinship systems explainer and the kinship terms chart show these mergers across whole terminologies, and cross and parallel cousins covers the distinction most of them turn on.
Kroeber (1909) argued that terminologies differ in which of a small set of distinctions they use. Later writers name his eight as follows.
| Principle | Question it asks | English |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | same, senior or junior generation? | used: father vs brother |
| Affinity | related by blood or by marriage? | used: brother vs brother-in-law |
| Collaterality | direct line or side line? | used: father vs uncle |
| Sex of relative | male or female? | used: uncle vs aunt |
| Bifurcation | sex of the linking relative? | not used: uncle for FB and MB |
| Sex of speaker | is a man or a woman speaking? | not used |
| Relative age | older or younger? | not used for siblings |
| Decedence | is the linking relative alive? | not used |
Later writers add a ninth, polarity: whether the two people in a relationship use different terms for each other (aunt and niece) or the same one (cousin and cousin).
A worked example
Take FyBD (ws), a woman's father's younger brother's daughter.
- Read it: Ego is a woman; her father's younger brother has a daughter.
- Count: up to the shared grandparents is u = 2, down to the relative is d = 2. Generation G0, collateral distance 2, a first cousin, not removed.
- Classify: the linking siblings, F and FB, are both male, so she is a parallel cousin. American English says cousin; an Iroquois-type terminology would use the sister term.
- Reverse: from the cousin, step to her father (F), then to his brother, Ego's father (B), then to Ego (D). The converse is FBD again, but the age marker flips, because Ego's father is the elder of the two brothers. From the cousin's side the relationship is FeBD (ws).
Further reading
- Kroeber, A. L. (1909). "Classificatory systems of relationship." Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 39: 77-84. doi:10.2307/2843284
- Barnard, Alan, and Anthony Good (1984). Research Practices in the Study of Kinship. London: Academic Press.
- Courrège, Philippe (1965). "Un modèle mathématique des structures élémentaires de parenté." L'Homme 5(3-4): 248-290. Persée
- Read, Dwight W. (1984). "An algebraic account of the American kinship terminology." Current Anthropology 25(4): 417-449. doi:10.1086/203160